Relationship between Organizational Learning and Training and Development
Relationship
between Organizational Learning and Training and Development

Organizational learning
is an intricate, three-factor process consisting of the
acquisition, dissemination and shared implementation of knowledge.
What is organizational Learning?
According to the Michael
Armstrong (2022) “Training is the formal and systematic modification of
behavior through learning which occurs as a result of education, instruction,
development and planned experience. Development is improving individual
performance in their present Roles and preparing them for greater
responsibilities in the future”.
According to the Argyris, C. (1993), Organizational learning is
the process of transferring knowledge within an organization. Through
organizational learning, employees can develop new skills. Successful training
courses give employees the tools and knowledge to support a company's business
objectives. Depending on the need, the skills transferred may be technical,
organizational, or contextual. Management takes the initiative to choose right training methods to fill up the
skill gap in the organization.
Why is organizational learning critical for the business?
The
COVID-19 pandemic has thrown the global economy into great uncertainty. Coupled
with constantly evolving technology and increasingly demanding customer needs,
businesses today are facing unprecedented challenges. An organization’s ability
to learn quickly and adapt readily to such volatile market conditions can be a
significant competitive advantage. As a result, organizational learning has
gained prominence in recent times. To fully reap the benefits of organizational
learning, organizations should continually adapt their behavior to reflect the
new knowledge gained from this process. Instead of simply doing things “the way
we have always done it”, organizations can gain knowledge and improve over time
by learning from its experiences. There is a positive impacts of organizational
learning such as creating knowledge, increasing capacity, improving
performance, developing talent and providing competitive advantage. It also
benefits customer satisfaction and even the revenue and profits generated by a
company.
(a (a) Adapt to change/ Increased Agility
With the business environment changing rapidly, there are no choice but to walk fast and keep pace with others. By continually learning and sharing knowledge within the company, it becomes easier to adapt to customer demand, market conditions, and unforeseen external factors.
( (b) Improve productivity
Lack of skill development and in-depth knowledge about subjects lead to increased shoulder taps, documentation chaos, and lost time. All of this contributes to productivity loss. Organizational learning creates a work culture where employees can enhance their knowledge, learn new skills and stay at par with the industry trends. This allows them to be their productive best at work and contribute towards organizations business goals.
(c) Increase profitability
With the employees becoming more knowledgeable, skilled,
and updated, every team is bound to perform remarkably well. That means
every department, be it sales, customer support, technical, product, or
marketing, will generate never-before-seen improvements, leading to overall
business success. The better products and services are, the more satisfied
customers are, the higher profits organization will clock in the long term.
(d)
Reduce turnover and increase job satisfaction
Organizational learning builds an
environment of knowledge sharing and retention. They are adept with the work
processes, market trends, industry news, and most importantly, the skills
required to excel in their departments. Imagine if every employee possesses
this knowledge, it will make your workplace so much knowledge-driven and
growth-focused. Besides, organizational learning also strengthens the
competitive edge, improves employee
retention, and takes the business growth to the next level.
Learning practices
Figure 1-Organizational
learning process (Author developed)
According to the Crossan, M.,
Lane, H. & White, R. (1999), Organizational learning is a multi-level process: individual,
group and organization. These three levels are linked by four social and
psychological processes (the 4Is) which are defined in the 4I theory of Crossan
(1999).
THE
4I THEORY: CROSSAN ET AL (1999)
Figure 2: (Crossan, Lane and White,1999)
Intuiting is the recognition of the pattern and/or possibilities inherent in
a personal stream of experience. This process can affect the actions of
individuals and of others when they interact with the individual. Individuals
can be given the chance to gather and analyze field information, form new ideas
concerning the business environment. For an example individuals should be able to discern
patterns in evolving consumer tastes by listening to customer comments.
Interpreting is the explanation,
through words and/or actions, of an insight or idea to one’s self and to
others. Individuals can be given the chance to share what they have
learned about changes in customer requirements and competitors’ actions, refine
ideas about market trends. For an example if one design engineer share their
details with other design engineers or with the company’s project progress
reports, they can validate or modify what they had learned from the customers.
Integrating is the process of
developing shared understanding among individuals and of taking coordinated
action through mutual adjustment. This process will initially be informal, but
if the coordinated action taking is recurring and significant, it will be
institutionalized. Individuals can be given the chance to communicate
what has been learned with other functional areas of the company. If the design
engineers’ ideas are brought forward in a forum – such as a progress meeting –
where they can be evaluated by people from other areas of the company, the
participants can discuss and act upon their assessment of the changes in
consumer tastes.
Institutionalizing is the process
of ensuring that routinized actions occur. Tasks are defined, actions specified
and organizational mechanisms are put in place. Institutionalizing sets
organizational learning apart from individual or ad hoc group learning. Individuals
can be given the chance to incorporate
new knowledge into the strategies and plans of the organization. A company
could set up a formal process as part of the progress reports and progress
meetings; this would enable individuals to bring forward new ideas where they
will be refined, disseminated, and acted upon.
Processing
Learning process
Knowledge
originating with individual employees is disseminated throughout the
organization. Each phase of the 4Is cycle affords an opportunity for critical
refinement of the ideas, suspicions, or simply gut-feelings generated by individuals
close to customers and consumers. Hence framework for companies to
institutionalize organizational knowledge. Companies implement learning process
to align operations with short and long-range goals and to strike a balance
between supply and demand. We have presented a new reason for utilizing a learning
process: to facilitate knowledge creation, dissemination, and
institutionalization. While the goals of learning process are reason enough for
its implementation, the added benefits from knowledge creation should serve as
an incentive to firms still without a learning process to consider putting one
in place and for companies where the process is already in place to utilize it
to further organizational learning.
References
Armstrong,M. (2022), Armstrong’s Handbook of Learning and
Development. Great Britain and the United States: Kogan page Limited.
Buckley,M. Caple,J. The
theory and practice of training. (2009). 6th Edn. India : Replika
Press Pvt Ltd.
Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for Action: A Guides to Overcoming
Barriers to Organizational Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.
Klatt, D. (1999). The Ultimate Training Workshop Handbook.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Crossan,
M., Lane, H. & White, R. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From
intuition to institution, Academy of Management Review, 24, 3, 522-537.
Nonaka,
I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company, Harvard Business Review,
November-December, 96-104.



Although the literature generally agrees that training increases a company's success, the empirical study does not always back this up. One theory is that training has an indirect impact on performance by increasing other organizational outcomes. Organizational learning is one of the variables that mediate the relationship between training and performance, and adopting a learning-oriented training improves performance through improving organizational learning.
ReplyDeleteReference
Aragón, M.I.B., Jiménez, D.J. and Valle, R.S., 2014. Training and performance: The mediating role of organizational learning. BRQ business research quarterly, 17(3), pp.161-173.